Human-AI Interaction in the Metaverse: A Maqasid al-Shariah Conceptual Framework for Autonomous Agents, Virtual Governance, and Moral Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63199/an-nahdhah.v2i1.99Keywords:
Metaverse; Artificial Intelligence; Shariah; Maqasid al-Shariah; Virtual Governance; Moral EducationAbstract
The rapid convergence of artificial intelligence and immersive virtual environments has given rise to the Metaverse, a persistent digital space in which autonomous AI agents increasingly mediate human social, economic, and educational interaction. Existing Islamic legal scholarship has examined the legal capacity of AI and has proposed maqasid-based governance for Islamic finance and for national regulation, but it has not yet shown how the legal status of autonomous agents, governance in a space without a single jurisdiction, and moral education in immersive settings depend on one another. This study addresses that gap by asking how maqasid al-Shariah and the classical doctrine of legal capacity (al-ahliyyah) can ground a conceptual framework for autonomous agents, virtual governance, and moral education in the Metaverse. Using a qualitative library research method, the study analyzes classical fiqh concepts alongside contemporary Islamic legal scholarship on artificial intelligence, robotics, and digital ethics, and situates them within the secular literature on metaverse governance and virtual moral education. The study advances three conceptual propositions. First, autonomous AI agents cannot bear full legal or moral responsibility (taklif) because they lack the volition and consciousness required by Islamic legal theory, yet a bounded, functional capacity can be recognized for practical governance purposes, with liability ultimately resting with human developers, operators, and institutions. Second, the five maqasid can be mapped onto the governance gaps documented in secular metaverse scholarship to yield a jurisdiction-independent review checklist. Third, immersive moral education is compatible with tarbiyah only when its design is governed by explicit safeguards. The main contribution of this study is an integrated, maqasid-based framework that links these three areas, which have so far been examined separately. The findings are conceptual and normative rather than empirically tested, and they carry practical implications for Islamic financial and educational institutions designing metaverse platforms and AI agents intended for Muslim users.
References
Al-Momani, I. M. (2025). Ethical challenges for using artificial intelligence in understanding Islamic jurisprudence. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia - Serie de Conferencias, 4, Article 1519. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251519
Alamsyah, M. F., & Remanda, A. (2026). Ethics of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the paradigm of Islamic law. Sicopus: Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(1), 91-104.
Ali, F., Bouzoubaa, K., Gelli, F., Hamzi, B., & Khan, S. (2025). Islamic ethics and AI: An evaluation of existing approaches to AI using trusteeship ethics. Philosophy & Technology, 38(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00922-4
Alif Auladi, G., & Muwahid, F. (2025). Cybersecurity and moral responsibility: A philosophical-Islamic approach to digital trust. TechComp Innovations: Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.70063/techcompinnovations.v2i1.93
Dunivan, D. W., Mann, P., Collins, D., & Wittmer, D. P. (2024). Expanding the empirical study of virtual reality beyond empathy to compassion, moral reasoning, and moral foundations. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1402754. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1402754
Elmahjub, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) in Islamic ethics: Towards pluralist ethical benchmarking for AI. Philosophy & Technology, 36(4), Article 73.
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Gorian, E., & Osman, N. D. (2024). Digital ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.798
Hamsin, M. K., Anggriawan, R., & Jiatrahman, F. (2023). Unveiling ethical implications: AI robot accountability in Islamic context. Jurnal Media Hukum, 30(2), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v30i2.18524
Harrison, T. (2023). Virtual reality and character education: Learning opportunities and risks. Journal of Moral Education, 53(2), 219-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2206553
Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), Article 12451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451
Kourtesis, P. (2024). A comprehensive review of multimodal XR applications, risks, and ethical challenges in the Metaverse. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(11), Article 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8110098
Kurian, N., & Hajir, B. (2024). Should we stop talking about empathy? Virtual reality, refugee children and the ethics of technology-mediated moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 53(4), 699-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2300503
Mohammed, T. A. S. (2024). A scientometric study of Maqasid al-shariah research: Trending issues, hotspot research, and co-citation analysis. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 9, Article 1439407. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1439407
Munshi, A. A., AlSabban, W. H., Farag, A. T., Rakha, O. E., Al Sallab, A., & Alotaibi, M. (2022). Automated Islamic jurisprudential legal opinions generation using artificial intelligence. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, 30(2), 1135-1156. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.30.2.16
Najib, N. M., Basarud-din, S. K., & Fazial, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) in Islamic finance: A Maqasid al-Shariah perspective. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 10(40), 41-50.
Nawi, A., Khamis, N. Y., Mohd Yaakob, M. F., Samuri, M. A. A., & Zakaria, G. A. N. (2023). Exploring opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence research for Islamic ethical guidelines. Afkar: Jurnal Akidah dan Pemikiran Islam, 25(2), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol25no2.1
Qin, H. X., Wang, Y., & Hui, P. (2025). Identity, crimes, and law enforcement in the Metaverse. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 194. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04266-w
Qutieshat, E., Al Adwan, M., & Khater, M. (2026). Artificial intelligence in Islamic law: Ethics, governance, and accountability. Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v4i2.236
Rueda, J., & Lara, F. (2020). Virtual reality and empathy enhancement: Ethical aspects. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, Article 506984. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.506984
Sitiris, M., & Busari, S. A. (2024). The legal capacity (al-ahliyyah) of artificial intelligence from an Islamic jurisprudential perspective. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no1.453
Sudirman, S., Sutiah, S., & Supriyono, S. (2025). Islamic law in the era of artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, 5(4), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v5i4.1072
Tyagi, A. (2025). Regulating the Metaverse: Legal challenges in virtual worlds and digital assets [Working paper]. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5267789
Yunos, A. S., Wan Saifuddin, W. M. S., & Hamdan, M. N. (2024). The concept of al-'ahliyyah and takyif fiqhiyy for autonomous mobile robots according to syariah. Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 33(7), 14-32. https://al-qanatir.com/aq/article/view/1035
Zafar, M. B., & Ali, H. (2025). Shariah governance standard on generative AI for Islamic financial institutions [SSRN Scholarly Paper]. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5143165
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zarqa Zulifqar (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
